1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 GIM, The
Global Intelligent Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 2 The Rise of Homo Sapiens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1 Animals
Using Production Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3 Tools in the Early Agricultural Empires . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 3.1 Economic
Surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 4 The Axial Age and the Birth of Western Science . . . . . .55 4.1 The Axial
Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55 5 Machines in Classical Antiquity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83 5.1 The Invention
of Artillery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6 The Middle Ages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.1 Marco Polo
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 7 The Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution . . . . . . .145 7.1 The Invention
of the Printing Press . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145 8
The First Wave of Industrial Revolution: Cotton Textiles 8.1 The Background
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 9
The Second Wave of Industrial Revolution: Railroads 9.1 Globalization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 10 More Scientific Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 10.1 Electrical
Engineering . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 241 11 Electronic Brains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 11.1 The Fourth
Wave and the First Programmable Computers . 267 12 Towards the Global Intelligent Machine . . . . . . .. . . . 293 12.1 Early Hybrid
Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 13 Epilogue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 13.1 Hindsight
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
319 Endnotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 327 Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 349 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 Note: I have italicized sections of particular relevance to my projects. – RD |
Note sections of special interest to my projects:
4.2 The Rise of Abstract Symbolic Thought in China and India
5.14 Automata
6.7 Automata
6.8 Chinese Influence in the West 120
6.9 The Golden Age of Islamic Science
6.10 Islamic Culture, the Information Machines of the Three Banu Musa
6.15 The Vision of Ramon Llull
6.16 Llull’s Influence
7.16 The Dream of a Mathesis Universalis
7.17 Calculators
7.18 Scepticism
8.15 The Clockmakers and the Art of the Transformation of Motion
8.17 Babbage’s Machines
12.2 Karel Čapek
Koetsiers book aims at global comprehensiveness and is impressive as far as it goes. Oddly, though, Karl Marxs pivotal contribution is bypassed completely. The closest we come to is this, section 8.7Innovation and Long Waveswhich begins thusly (p. 185-186, boldface mine, endnotes omitted):
In 1926 the Russian economist Nikolai Kondratieff published a paper with empirical data that he had collected on capitalist economies and he argued that such economies follow cycles of depression (crisis), recovery, prosperity, and recession (stagnation) that last about half a century. Kondratieff used time series of price, wage and interest rates and he found cycles with peaks at 1810-1817, 1870-1875 and 1914-1920. Kondratieff thought he had discovered long waves with a period of roughly 50 years in the development of capitalist economies.
Kondratieff was not the first to notice the phenomenon. Thirteen years earlier a Dutchman and Marxist economist, Jacob van Gelderen (1891-1940), had come to the same conclusion. Kondratiefs work however, made a special impact when people realized that it seemed that he had predicted the 1929 crisis.
Interpreting economic statistics is not easy. Capitalist economies are very complex and there are several parameters to consider when one tries to establish a wave pattern. Kondratieff looked at prices, but investment activities and industrial output are other factors worth considering. And then, assuming the pattern that Kondratieff noticed in the statistics corresponds to something real, several questions arise. What causes the pattern? To what extent is it an essential aspect of capitalist economy?
Kondratieff formulated several characteristics of the waves. One of them was that during the downswing many important inventions in the techniques of production and communication are made, although they are usually applied on a large scale only at the beginning of the next long upswing. In 1939 the Harvard economist Joseph Alois Schumpeter (1883-1950) published his book Business Cycles in which he tried to explain the cyclical phenomena that Kondratieff had noticed. Schumpeter based his explanation on the clustering of technical innovations during the recession phase which is followed by a new expansion based upon these technical innovations. According to Schumpeter the essential link between innovations and cyclical fluctuations is this. The innovations are new combinations of materials and productive forces. The cycles arise because innovations occur in groups or swarms. And why do they occur in swarms? Schumpeter: Exclusively because the appearance of one or a few entrepreneurs facilitates the appearance of others, and these the appearance of more, in ever increasing numbers. Inevitably such booms will come to an end. Schumpeter put the peak of the first wave in 1813/14, the peak of the second wave in 1869/70 and the peak of the third in 1924/25. Schumpeter added: These datings do not lack historical justification. Yet they are not only tentative, but also by nature merely approximate.
The separate theoretical and historiographical trajectories of science and technology studies, Marxism and critical theory need to be brought together, in view of overcoming the provincialism of disparate traditions in the intellectual division of labor. Marx was heavily influenced by Charles Babbages work on machinery and capitalist economics, but never got around to engaging Babbages work on his analytical engine, i.e., the direct ancestor of the electronic computer. This history can be enriched by a Marxist perspective, and critical theory needs to improve its engagement with this history so as to further a more concrete and credible account of the intertwining of reason and irrationality in the productions of human history.
One aspect of this history is the history of symbolic, notational, and conceptual technology that enables thought and cultural expression to progress. An interesting perspective on this evolution form the standpoint of today's conceptualization of information an be found here:
Cramer, Florian. Words Made Flesh: Code, Culture, Imagination. Rotterdam: Piet Zwart Institute, 2005.
SOURCE: Koetsier, Teun. The Ascent of GIM, the Global Intelligent Machine: A History of Production and Information Machines. Cham: Springer, 2019. Contents, pp. ix- xiii.
Home Page | Site
Map | What's New | Coming
Attractions | Book News
Bibliography | Mini-Bibliographies
| Study Guides | Special
Sections
My Writings | Other
Authors' Texts | Philosophical Quotations
Blogs | Images
& Sounds | External Links
CONTACT Ralph Dumain
Uploaded 29 September 2020
Links added 14-15 November 2023
Site ©1999-2023 Ralph Dumain