Is philosophical creativity combinatorial?

Henri Lefebvre

The seduction of philosophy arises from the fact that the philosopher can, with a great freedom of choice, draw from this reserve of paradigms whatever he needs for expression or formulation. The wealth of this reserve contrasts with the severity of constraints (syntagmatic, that is to say, logical). The philosophical operation thus contains several phases: drawing from the reserve (that is to say, from this or that class of signifiers), confrontation between the elements selected, elaboration under rigorous constraints (which eliminates certain combinations in the name of the fundamental demand for coherence). Each philosopher conducts these operations in his own manner, as a function of his problematic, which he receives from his predecessors or obtains from his age. This analysis (for philosophy as for praxis, several analyses are possible!) offers us three elements: one coming from the philosophy of the past (problems, concepts), the other from the philosopher’s environment, and a third from the exploration of the possible, which he transmits to his successors (concepts, problems, projects).

The seduction of philosophy hides more than one trap. In its time of withering away, it becomes an intellectual game, a relatively easy combinatory, which facilitates the recruitment of philosophers and gives them the illusion of following the path of great creators, those who discovered an enlightening or productive combination, those who poetically employed a symbolism. How is philosophy taught? How does one penetrate into past philosophy, into philosophy in general and into each particular doctrine? By way of paradigms, and also by the syntagmatic connection, taking logical rigour as implicit or explicit reference. The paradigms of philosophy make it possible to conceive the internal architecture of each system: its own combination of symbols, concepts bound together with an optimum degree of rigour, categories that are legitimately or illegitimately postulated. They reveal to us the code with which the historian can subsequently decode (decipher) messages. The structural study of philosophies and of the conceptual architecture of systems is successful. Do its promoters clearly understand that this success seals the withering away of philosophy, by reducing it to the status of a dead language?

SOURCE: Lefebvre, Henri. Metaphilosophy, translated by David Fernbach, edited with an introduction by Stuart Elden. London; New York: Verso, 2016. Excerpt from Chapter 7: Philosophy as Message.

Ars combinatoria, cybernetics, mimesis & praxis
by Henri Lefebvre

Henri Lefebvre on Leibniz & Ars Combinatoria
by Henri Lefebvre

Henri Lefebvre’s Metaphilosophy – First Notes
by Ralph Dumain

Logique formelle, logique dialectique: Préface a la 3e édition
par Henri Lefebvre

Henri Lefebvre on Marx, Religion, Philosophy, Ideology & Politics

Henri Lefebvre on Praxis

On Charlie Chaplin by Henri Lefebvre

On Trends in the Status of Dialectical Logic: A Brief Study of Lefebvre, Ilyenkov and Wald
by Claude M. J. Braun

Badiou and the Bankruptcy of Fashionable French Philosophy
by R. Dumain

Hartshorne & Lovejoy on combinatorics & philosophical significance

Why Isn’t There More Progress in Philosophy (theses or arguments?)
by David J. Chalmers

Adorno on Progress in Philosophy

Leibniz & Ideology: Selected Bibliography

Philosophy of History of Philosophy & Historiography of Philosophy:
Selected Bibliography

Cybernetics & Artificial Intelligence: Ideology Critique

Ars Combinatoria Study Guide

Marx and Marxism Web Guide

Home Page | Site Map | What's New | Coming Attractions | Book News
Bibliography | Mini-Bibliographies | Study Guides | Special Sections
My Writings | Other Authors' Texts | Philosophical Quotations
Blogs | Images & Sounds | External Links

CONTACT Ralph Dumain

Uploaded 2 October 2019

Site ©1999-2020 Ralph Dumain