<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Studies in a Dying Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture</link>
	<description>What is to become of critical culture in this dumbed-down millennium?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dascal on Leibniz, epistemology &amp; intellectual cooperation by Dascal marcelo &#124; Zulufoto</title>
		<link>http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2010/11/dascal-on-leibniz-epistemology-intellectual-cooperation/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Dascal marcelo &#124; Zulufoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/?p=39#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] Studies in a Dying Culture &#187; Dascal on Leibniz, epistemology &#8230;Aug 10, 2008 &#8230; Dascal, Marcelo. Types of polemics and types of polemical &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Studies in a Dying Culture &#187; Dascal on Leibniz, epistemology &#8230;Aug 10, 2008 &#8230; Dascal, Marcelo. Types of polemics and types of polemical &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stephen Eric Bronner (3): Bronner vs. Goldner on science &amp; the Enlightenment by www.educationadvice4u.info &#187; Stephen Eric Bronner (3): Bronner vs. Goldner on science &#38; the &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/10/stephen-eric-bronner-3-bronner-vs-goldner-on-science-the-enlightenment/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>www.educationadvice4u.info &#187; Stephen Eric Bronner (3): Bronner vs. Goldner on science &#38; the &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/10/stephen-eric-bronner-3-bronner-vs-goldner-on-science-the-enlightenment/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] rdumain wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Stephen Eric Bronner (3): Bronner vs. Goldner on science &amp; the &#8230;&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractThe debate:. Bronner, Stephen Eric. &#8220;The Great Divide: The Enlightenment and its Critics,&#8221; New Politics, vol. 5, no. 3 (new series), whole no. 19, Summer 1995, pp. 65-86. Goldner, Loren. &#8220;A Reply to Stephen Eric Bronner: Renaissance or &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rdumain wrote a fantastic post today on &#8220;Stephen Eric Bronner (3): Bronner vs. Goldner on science &amp;amp; the &#8230;&#8221;Here&#8217;s ONLY a quick extractThe debate:. Bronner, Stephen Eric. &#8220;The Great Divide: The Enlightenment and its Critics,&#8221; New Politics, vol. 5, no. 3 (new series), whole no. 19, Summer 1995, pp. 65-86. Goldner, Loren. &#8220;A Reply to Stephen Eric Bronner: Renaissance or &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wittgenstein dramatized by Les</title>
		<link>http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/03/wittgenstein-dramatized/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/03/wittgenstein-dramatized/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&quot;He lived a secret sexual life, but insisted that nothing was hidden;&quot;

This isn&#039;t really a fair criticism.  If he had been open about his attraction for men, he would have been terribly mistreated and possibly jailed.  His prominence wouldn&#039;t have helped him, probably.  Wilde wasn&#039;t helped by fame, for example.  Even years later, the British government forced Alan Turing, one of the most brilliant computer scientists who ever lived, to take Estrogen against his wishes and drove him to suicide.  

Very interesting post, though.  Strongly stated.  I like your writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He lived a secret sexual life, but insisted that nothing was hidden;&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really a fair criticism.  If he had been open about his attraction for men, he would have been terribly mistreated and possibly jailed.  His prominence wouldn&#8217;t have helped him, probably.  Wilde wasn&#8217;t helped by fame, for example.  Even years later, the British government forced Alan Turing, one of the most brilliant computer scientists who ever lived, to take Estrogen against his wishes and drove him to suicide.  </p>
<p>Very interesting post, though.  Strongly stated.  I like your writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on January 2007 reading review (2) by Wendy</title>
		<link>http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/03/january-2007-reading-review-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autodidactproject.org/blog/culture/index.php/2007/03/january-2007-reading-review-2/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Kierkegaard is not to be included with the degenerate Heidegger and the scumbag Nietzsche. Sadly, it is the latter two, whom are detrimental to Kierkegaard as a great theologian, if not a good philosopher.

Read &quot;Works of Love&quot;; that book alone makes him one of the great theologians of our times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kierkegaard is not to be included with the degenerate Heidegger and the scumbag Nietzsche. Sadly, it is the latter two, whom are detrimental to Kierkegaard as a great theologian, if not a good philosopher.</p>
<p>Read &quot;Works of Love&quot;; that book alone makes him one of the great theologians of our times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

